Poppies and politics
Talk about a bumper harvest of opium poppies in Afghanistan. There's certainly been a bumper crop of poppies in Britain round this remembrance day. I can never remember a year when the poppies have been worn so early, so ubiquitously, and where there has been so much pressure on people to wear one.
I went on Sky on Saturday morning to debate with the sports editor of a Manchester paper who was campaigning for all the premier league football clubs to wear poppies embroidered on their kit. Manchester United and Liverpool had refused, despite being denounced by the Daily Mail. This was supposedly an unpatriotic outrage.
It seems to me that, whatever your attitude to the poppy, no one should be forced to wear one. Yet it is already clear that some people are. All newscasters and journalists are obviously told that they must sport one, and their guests are clearly strongly encouraged to do so. When you walk down the street some people wear poppies and some don't, and no one seems to worry too much about that. But they are pretty much uniform for a month or so among politicians and media.
This is all the more remarkable because for most of my life, poppy day was not promoted in this way, even though the memories of the First and Second World Wars were much more recent. Why is that? Well it is impossible not to draw the conclusion that this promotion of the poppy has something to do with Britain's involvement in the wars of the last decade. Government and military want to promote the poppy as giving in some way legitimacy to these wars.
That's the point made by the Manchester sports editor _ that it means supporting what the troops are doing.
Nothing new in that. The poppy appeal was actually launched after the First World War by Earl Haig ..the same Haig who was a general responsible for much of the bloodshed of that war. That's why to many, especially those of us who have opposed these and previous wars, the poppy has always been identified with militarism. Some pacifists wear a white poppy to make this point.
The paradox is that most people in this country (now 73%) want the troops out within a few months. So when many of them wear the poppy they do so not to support this current war but for some other reason. Maybe they are remembering the dead in past wars, maybe they want to express sorrow at the increasing rate of deaths of soldiers this year. Whatever it is, that sentiment should not be used to justify an indefensible war.
How typical that the people busiest promoting the poppy are the politicians , the media and the generals who argue for this bloodshed to continue.

3 Comments:
I think you are missing the point.
I wear a poppy for the fallen in all wars we have had since 1914 to maintain our freedom. Not because I support the Afghan war.
I am not urged to wear one by the government, or the armed forces – but by the quite thanks I wish to give to those who gave their lives so that I can live my life quietly and in peace.
I would also remind you that Servicemen's bravery in times past have provided you with the right to safely question and broadcast an anti Government message.
So please do not associate buying a poppy with support for a war because it simply does not work that way.
Jim
I to wear a poppy to remember others sacrifices while being totally against our involvement in Afghanistan (and Iraq). The 2 things are not the same and it is a shame you have tried to marry the things together as it does nothing to help the 'Stop The War' cause.
Stop the War is a busted flush. Only 200 turned up to harangue Blair = pathetic. The campaign has been taken over by Trots and extremists and is finished. Bye bye.
Post a Comment
<< Home